Different Dialects
All sections

Conflict Without Casualties

How do two people who love each other fight in a way that leaves them closer, instead of leaving casualties?

Somewhere in the first five modules you may have caught yourself thinking: this is all very nice, but none of it survives a real fight.

Fair. Listening loops and soft start-ups are easy on a calm Sunday. At 9:40 p.m. on a Tuesday night, when the same argument arrives for the fortieth time and your chest is tight and your partner has just said the exact sentence that always does it, none of them are anywhere to be found.

This module is about that Tuesday night.

Here is the first thing to know, and it is more encouraging than it sounds: fighting isn't the problem. Couples who last are not the ones who avoid conflict. In the research, happy couples and unhappy couples argue about strikingly similar things. What separates them is how the argument goes: how it starts, what each person does when it gets hot, whether anybody reaches out mid-fight, and what happens in the hour afterward.

That's learnable. Not easy, but learnable, which is the whole point of this module.

The module draws on two bodies of work. The first is John Gottman's observational research, which filmed thousands of couples arguing while measuring their heart rates and found that a handful of behaviors do most of the damage. The second is Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), developed by Leslie Greenberg and Sue Johnson, which looks underneath the behavior and asks what each partner is protecting. Where the sexes differ during conflict, the module says so, and it's equally honest about the places where the famous male–female pattern turns out to be less about sex than it looks.

The Driving Question

How do two people who love each other fight in a way that leaves them closer, instead of leaving casualties?

Gut Answer

Before Lesson 6.1, write down the fight you and your partner have most often, in one sentence, the way you'd describe it to a friend. If you're single, write the one you had most often in your last relationship. Then write who usually starts it and who usually ends it, and how. Date it. You'll come back to this page at the end of the module, and the second version will look different.

What You'll Be Able to Do

By the end of this module you'll be able to:

  • name the pursue–withdraw cycle you and your partner fall into, and treat the cycle rather than each other as the problem;
  • recognize the Four Horsemen (criticism, contempt, defensiveness, stonewalling) as they happen, and use the antidote for each;
  • notice flooding in your own body, call a time-out that doesn't feel like abandonment, and make and accept repair attempts mid-fight;
  • tell a perpetual problem from a solvable one, find the dream underneath a gridlocked issue, and compromise without either of you giving up a core need;
  • give a real apology with all six parts, tell forgiving from excusing, and recognize the point at which a relationship needs professional help, or a safety plan rather than a communication skill.

Time

About 3 to 3.25 hours: five lessons of roughly 35 minutes each, plus the check-in. Two of the exercises (the time-out agreement in 6.3 and the dreams interview in 6.4) are worth doing properly, with your partner, on a calm evening. They're the two that change the most.

A note before you start

This module is about conflict between two people who are both trying. It is not about abuse. If your partner frightens you, controls you, or hurts you, that's a different situation and it needs different help; Lesson 6.5 says so plainly, and When to Get Help is there whenever you want it.

We use cookies that are necessary to run this site. With your consent, we’d also like to use analytics cookies to understand usage and improve the course. See our Cookie Policy.